Cross-posted at Gavel to Gavel
At this point, at least some courts in nearly every U.S. state have some form of e-filing of court documents (details can be found at the National Center for State Court's e-filing Resource Guide), including Texas. That state's system was the subject of an interim meeting of the House Committee on Judiciary & Civil Jurisprudence.
Thursday, July 19, 2012
Monday, July 16, 2012
More on PDF
The PDF document file format is confusing to many because it can do so much. This post provides a list of resources that may help.
Monday, July 9, 2012
The "Flavors" of PDF
PDF has many different capabilities that can be confusing. This article explains some of them.
Tuesday, July 3, 2012
This and That in Court Tech - July 2012
E-courts education program, Canadian court tech conference, SJI assists Minnesota self-represented E-filing, mandatory E-filing in Utah and Florida, and Pennsylvania tweets court rules.
Monday, June 25, 2012
South Carolina legislature overrides governor, allows CJ to set e-filing fees to pay for court technology
Cross-posted at Gavel to Gavel
I mentioned two weeks ago the e-filing fees situation in South Carolina. In sum, the legislature unanimously adopted HB 4821, which would have allowed the state's chief justice to set an e-filing fee to pay for court technology
I mentioned two weeks ago the e-filing fees situation in South Carolina. In sum, the legislature unanimously adopted HB 4821, which would have allowed the state's chief justice to set an e-filing fee to pay for court technology
for filing court documents by electronic means from an integrated electronic filing (e-filing) system owned and operated by the South Carolina Judicial Department in an amount set by the Chief Justice of the South Carolina Supreme Court and all fees must be remitted to the South Carolina Judicial Department to be dedicated to the support of court technologyDespite the legislature's unanimity, the governor vetoed the bill, arguing no "branch of government should be provided with such comprehensive, unilateral authority to impose fees without regulatory or other comparable review." The South Carolina legislature has now voted to override the governor's veto: 93-14 in the House and 39-3 in the Senate.
Friday, June 22, 2012
Michigan legislature set to officially kill off its cyber court?
Cross-posted at Gavel to Gavel
Back in 2001 amid another recession, Michigan's legislature made an attempt to address the issue of technology-related litigation by authorizing the creation of a "Cyber Court", the purpose of which was (MCL 600.8001(2)) to:
Back in 2001 amid another recession, Michigan's legislature made an attempt to address the issue of technology-related litigation by authorizing the creation of a "Cyber Court", the purpose of which was (MCL 600.8001(2)) to:
Thursday, June 21, 2012
Court Case Management Systems 2012 Part 1: It’s About Change
It’s all about change. The technology has changed. The expectations have changed. Therefore, court case management has changed.
Friday, June 15, 2012
Third Annual Social Media and Courts Survey
The NCSC announced the third annual social media and the courts survey.
Wednesday, June 13, 2012
Thursday, June 7, 2012
Court Case Management 2012
Some of my colleagues and I are planning on writing a series of articles on Court Case Management Systems over the next year (or two).
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)