- Juvenile Petition
- Adjudication Order
- Service Plan
- Court Report
A field test in Vermont has revealed that the template can accommodate an overwhelming percentage of use cases without modification.
"Unlike traditional browser cookies, Flash cookies are relatively unknown to web users, and they are not controlled through the cookie privacy controls in a browser. That means even if a user thinks they have cleared their computer of tracking objects, they most likely have not.
What’s even sneakier?For detailed information see The Electronic Privacy Information Center web page on the subject at:
Several services even use the surreptitious data storage to reinstate traditional cookies that a user deleted, which is called re-spawning in homage to video games where zombies come back to life even after being "killed," the report found. So even if a user gets rid of a website’s tracking cookie, that cookie’s unique ID will be assigned back to a new cookie again using the Flash data as the "backup.""
"It is intended to be a resource for public safety practitioners who are making decisions with regard to procurement for public safety computer systems that have, or may in the future have, information sharing requirements with other systems. The goal is to help ensure RFPs meet federal grant requirements and national best practices for information sharing, and to provide help in understanding the technology standards and how they relate to product selection. The National Information Exchange Model NIEM, which is most often included in U.S. Department of Justice DOJ and U.S. Department of Homeland Security DHS grant requirements, is a national approach and common vocabulary for information exchange."
"NIEM Conformance for RFPs was developed by the IJIS Institute’s Public Safety Technical Standards Committee IPSTSC and is available online:
http://www.ijis.org/docs/NIEM_Conformance_for_RFP_20091028.pdf
"Converting files for the county criminal, family and civil cases to electronic form and destroying the old-fashioned versions."The article further notes that:
"Seventeen district clerk employees spent a combined 250 hours scanning thousands of documents in Magnis court over an August weekend."And in the sidebar - Going Paperless: By the Numbers the article states two significant facts:
- 75 percent: Amount of requested files from the clerks office that are from the last two years
- Jan. 1, 2010: The date Dallas County new criminal cases will no longer generate paper files
The federal judiciary's Case Management/Electronic Case Files CM/ECF project revolutionized the way in which the federal courts manage their cases and documents. This easy-to-use system allows attorneys to file documents directly with the court over the Internet and allows courts to file, store, and manage their case files in an easy-to-access, transparent way.The September, 2009 edition of The Third Branch Newsletter also contained two articles of interest. The first, Electronic Public Access Program/PACER Assessment Begun, notes:
The Judiciary’s Electronic Public Access Program is looking for user input. The program, which recently celebrated its one-millionth Public Access to Court Electronic Records PACER subscriber, has launched a year-long, comprehensive assessment to identify potential enhancements to existing and new public access services.The newsletter also contained an article titled: "Reminder to Redact". As most everyone who works with electronic document information is aware, redaction of sensitive private information is critical. The article describes the Federal Courts approach to the issue. It begins:
"Attorneys using the Judiciary’s Case Management/Electronic Case Files CM/ECF system will find they must acknowledge a reminder to redact private information from documents before they access the system. It is part of the Judiciary’s on-going effort to protect privacy in publicly accessible court records by reminding attorneys that it is their responsibility to comply with redaction rules."
"A message is displayed when an attorney logs in to CM/ECF. The attorney is required to check a box on the last line of the reminder to show they have read it. The message also provides links to the Federal Rules regarding redaction. In addition, another reminder message has been added to the screen where the attorney finalizes submission of the filed document. The message asks: 'Have you redacted?'”