Earlier in 2010, Gavel to Gavel looked at efforts by state legislatures to mandate more electronic filing of court documents. Much of the focus was on civil cases, however Florida’s Senate is considering a plan to press for criminal case e-filing. SB 170 of 2011 would require prosecutors and public defenders to e-file documents with the clerk of court and report back on March 1, 2012 on the implementation of the program to the legislature.
Cross-posted at Gavel to Gavel blog
Thursday, December 23, 2010
Monday, November 29, 2010
Court Tech Bulletin's New Home
We have joined "the cloud" at the CTB. This will be the new home of the Court Technology Bulletin. We look forward to interacting with everyone in the future.
Also don't forget about the E-Courts Conference 2010 West coming up December 13-15, 2010 in Las Vegas.
Monday, August 30, 2010
SEARCH Launches New JIEM Website
JIEM 4.0 – developed through funding from the U.S. Department of Justice, Bureau of Justice Assistance (BJA) is being released in Fall 2007. It is an evolution of the current web-based tool which has proven to be a popular and effective requirements-gathering resource. The release has been driven by consistent user feedback that has demonstrated the need for functionality that will soon be available in the new Eclipse-based JIEM tool. This functionality:
- Improves the Tools usability and efficiency
- Supports more rapid and inexpensive addition of new features in the future
- Requires no connection to the Internet, running locally on the users workstation
- Allows for easier sharing of exchange models with other users
- Provides more robust support for XML and integration with other modeling and development tools
- Allows considerable user customization of the tools look and feel
- Employs many "rich client" features that users experience in other modeling tools.
Visit the JIEM website to learn more.
Friday, August 13, 2010
Appellate Court E-Filing - 2010
During the recent National Association of Appellate Court Clerks conference, a presentation on lessons learned from E-filing projects was made. Supreme Courts in Wyoming, Texas and North Carolina shared their experiences.
We also became recently aware that the Supreme Court of Georgia is allowing members in good standing are allowed to register to E-file. In an article by the Savannah Morning News, Chief Justice Carol Hunstein
was quoted:
We also became recently aware that the Supreme Court of Georgia is allowing members in good standing are allowed to register to E-file. In an article by the Savannah Morning News, Chief Justice Carol Hunstein
was quoted:
What we’re talking about here is a revolutionary change that is a win-win situation for the Court and for the litigants,” Hunstein.said. The parties will save time and money by no longer having to print, copy and deliver paper documents. No more fighting Atlanta traffic to get those documents into our Clerk’s office by the 4:30 filing deadline. Details about the system can be found at: http://www.gasupreme.us/efile/index.php
Paper on Demand Case Study
Periodically the NCSC has developed case study papers for court technology. The most recent one is A Case Study of Paper on Demand POD that focuses on E-filing in Colorado and Utah. You can download a PDF copy here.
NCSC releases 22nd edition of Future Trends in State Courts
Williamsburg, Virginia, USA - June 30, 2010 - The evaluation and adjustment of court operations to improve processes and save money while increasing efficiency and maintaining service levels to the public - a process known as court re-engineering - is the central theme of Future Trends in State Courts 2010, the latest edition of the National Center for State Courts NCSC annual report on Trends in State Courts series. This is the 22nd edition of the series, which is dedicated to making courts aware of key trends that affect not only court operations, but also the role of courts in society.
A limited number of free printed copies of Future Trends 2010 are available by contacting the National Center at 1-800-616-6164. In addition, the National Center is offering a CD containing electronic versions of this year edition as well as the 2000-09 editions. The publication can also be accessed online at: http://www.ncsconline.org/D_KIS/Trends/
A limited number of free printed copies of Future Trends 2010 are available by contacting the National Center at 1-800-616-6164. In addition, the National Center is offering a CD containing electronic versions of this year edition as well as the 2000-09 editions. The publication can also be accessed online at: http://www.ncsconline.org/D_KIS/Trends/
Monday, July 26, 2010
Indiana Looks for New Appellate CMS
On July 9, 2010 the following was posted:
The Division of State Court Administration STAD is responsible for delivering information technology solutions to the Appellate Courts of the State of Indiana defined collectively as the Supreme Court, Court of Appeals, and Tax Court and to related judicial agencies, including the Clerk’s Office.
STAD is seeking proposals for the delivery of an Appellate Case Management System CMS, with public access and electronic case filing capabilities, for the State’s Appellate Courts. The PNCO website with relevant document links is located at: http://www.in.gov/judiciary/admin/pnco.html
Editor's note: even if you will never issue an appellate court request for proposal, one might want to collect these documents for future reference and ideas for your own RFP
The Division of State Court Administration STAD is responsible for delivering information technology solutions to the Appellate Courts of the State of Indiana defined collectively as the Supreme Court, Court of Appeals, and Tax Court and to related judicial agencies, including the Clerk’s Office.
STAD is seeking proposals for the delivery of an Appellate Case Management System CMS, with public access and electronic case filing capabilities, for the State’s Appellate Courts. The PNCO website with relevant document links is located at: http://www.in.gov/judiciary/admin/pnco.html
Editor's note: even if you will never issue an appellate court request for proposal, one might want to collect these documents for future reference and ideas for your own RFP
Friday, July 16, 2010
Comments on Courtroom Technology
On June 16, 2010 authors George C. Zumbano and Benjamin R. Messing posted an article - Technology Is a Double-Edged Sword in the Courtroom on Law.com. The article contains sections on cost-benefit analysis, effectively utilizing technology, and avoiding presentation problems.
Friday, July 9, 2010
Mastering the Unpredictable
A book released earlier this year titled: Mastering the Unpredictable, How Adaptive Case Management Will Revolutionize the Way that Knowledge Workers Get Things Done includes a chapter by NCSC Senior Management Consultant, John Matthias. Johns chapter, Technology for Case Management, builds on the overall theme stated by the author that - some kinds of work are unpredictable. We in the courts are reminded every day that this is true.
The book brings together for the first time in one volume ideas that address this issue. To read a summary go to the authors, Keith D. Swensons blog at: http://kswenson.wordpress.com/2010/04/14/launching-mastering-the-unpredictable/
The book's website is: http://www.masteringtheunpredictable.com/page1.php
The book brings together for the first time in one volume ideas that address this issue. To read a summary go to the authors, Keith D. Swensons blog at: http://kswenson.wordpress.com/2010/04/14/launching-mastering-the-unpredictable/
The book's website is: http://www.masteringtheunpredictable.com/page1.php
Wednesday, June 23, 2010
Why the Future Is Not Paper - Second in a Series
Many courts are continuing to view and insist that E-filed electronic documents should continue to be functionally the same as their paper and much dumber cousins. Please consider that information entombed in a paper document is now locked as to the accuracy of the moment it is printed. It is essentially a snapshot. This of course results in all sorts of problems as to the information accuracy when that paper document is later read and used. And unfortunately, judges and court staff are relying on the accuracy of that locked paper information to make decisions that affect people’s lives.
Say for example a person has a judgment later set aside. The original judgment document is still there as the written case record. But later when the document becomes invalid, wouldn’t it be great if the original document could display a link maybe even a flashing icon to the later and more current order? Of course
it would. The electronic document world can and should be information dynamic. The electronic legal research companies are providing tools that automatically perform cite and currency checks against statutory and case law. Why wouldn't the courts take advantage of this capability in the documents submitted for action? Hyper-links and icons can indicate whether the citation is accurate and when the statute was changed.
Future electronic documents could also provide similar checks against the appropriate databases for a persons’ status say if they were on probation or had a civil protection order in another jurisdiction. The accuracy checks could be done dynamically when the document is displayed and in turn, reduces the need to capture this information in the court’s case management system. Now we know the argument is that the original document shouldn't be changed because it represents the actual case submissions and that status must be preserved for potential appellate review. We would in turn argue that the reference links could be filtered or “turned-off” when used in an appellate or similar context. Again, it is dynamic. Can your “dead-tree” document do that?
Next – how do you verify a paper document?
Say for example a person has a judgment later set aside. The original judgment document is still there as the written case record. But later when the document becomes invalid, wouldn’t it be great if the original document could display a link maybe even a flashing icon to the later and more current order? Of course
it would. The electronic document world can and should be information dynamic. The electronic legal research companies are providing tools that automatically perform cite and currency checks against statutory and case law. Why wouldn't the courts take advantage of this capability in the documents submitted for action? Hyper-links and icons can indicate whether the citation is accurate and when the statute was changed.
Future electronic documents could also provide similar checks against the appropriate databases for a persons’ status say if they were on probation or had a civil protection order in another jurisdiction. The accuracy checks could be done dynamically when the document is displayed and in turn, reduces the need to capture this information in the court’s case management system. Now we know the argument is that the original document shouldn't be changed because it represents the actual case submissions and that status must be preserved for potential appellate review. We would in turn argue that the reference links could be filtered or “turned-off” when used in an appellate or similar context. Again, it is dynamic. Can your “dead-tree” document do that?
Next – how do you verify a paper document?
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)